Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology

By Justin Alsing, Benjamin Dan Wandelt, S. Feeney. 2018

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many statistical models in cosmology can be simulated forwards but have intractable likelihood functions. Likelihood-free inference methods allow us to perform Bayesian inference from these models using only forward simulations, free from any likelihood assumptions or approximations. Likelihood-free inference generically involves simulating mock data and comparing to the observed data; this comparison in data space suffers from the curse of dimensionality and requires compression of the data to a small number of summary statistics to be tractable. In this paper, we use massive asymptotically optimal data compression to reduce the dimensionality of the data space to just one number per parameter, providing a natural and optimal framework for summary statistic choice for likelihood-free inference. Secondly, we present the first cosmological application of Density Estimation Likelihood-Free Inference (delfi), which learns a parametrized model for joint distribution of data and parameters, yielding both the parameter posterior and the model evidence. This approach is conceptually simple, requires less tuning than traditional Approximate Bayesian Computation approaches to likelihood-free inference and can give high-fidelity posteriors from orders of magnitude fewer forward simulations. As an additional bonus, it enables parameter inference and Bayesian model comparison simultaneously. We demonstrate delfi with massive data compression on an analysis of the joint light-curve analysis supernova data, as a simple validation case study. We show that high-fidelity posterior inference is possible for full-scale cosmological data analyses with as few as ∼10^4 simulations, with substantial scope for further improvement, demonstrating the scalability of likelihood-free inference to large and complex cosmological data sets.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistics and Probability, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Gilles Louppe
  2. Kyle Cranmer
  3. George Papamakarios
  4. Balaji Lakshminarayanan
  5. J. Brehmer
  6. Danilo Jimenez Rezende
  7. Shakir Mohamed
  8. Stefano Ermon

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Justin Alsing
  2. Benjamin Dan Wandelt
  3. Kyle Cranmer
  4. Gilles Louppe
  5. J. Brehmer
  6. S. Feeney
  7. Tom Charnock
  8. Juan Pavez

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Gilles Louppe
  2. Benjamin Dan Wandelt
  3. Justin Alsing
  4. Kyle Cranmer
  5. J. Brehmer
  6. S. Feeney
  7. Shakir Mohamed
  8. George Papamakarios

In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods

  1. Gilles Louppe
  2. Kyle Cranmer
  3. J. Brehmer
  4. George Papamakarios
  5. Danilo Jimenez Rezende
  6. Balaji Lakshminarayanan
  7. Iain Murray
  8. Shakir Mohamed

Citations in the corpus