Global parametrices and dispersive estimates for variable coefficient wave equations
By Jason Metcalfe, D. Tataru. 2007
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this article we consider variable coefficient time dependent wave equations in $${\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R}^n}$$ . Using phase space methods we construct outgoing parametrices and prove Strichartz type estimates globally in time. This is done in the context of C2 metrics which satisfy a weak asymptotic flatness condition at infinity.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe872ab5eab4a4e303f45d1e1fb844087728aa76
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Jason Metcalfe
- D. Tataru
- Christopher D. Sogge
- Chengbo Wang
- Jeremy Louis Marzuola
- Mihai Tohaneanu
- S. Aretakis
- Nicolas Burq
In Mathematical Physics
- Jason Metcalfe
- D. Tataru
- Christopher D. Sogge
- Chengbo Wang
- Jeremy Louis Marzuola
- Mihai Tohaneanu
- S. Aretakis
- Nicolas Burq
Citations in the corpus
- Concerning the wave equation on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds (2008, methodology): “The first seems to be that of Journ´e, Soer and Sogge [12] who proved global Strichartz estimates for Schr¨odinger operators with potential using local energy estimates (local smoothing) for eit . Stalani and Tataru [32] extended this philosphy by considering more general perturbations of , and more”
- Local decay of waves on asymptotically flat stationary space-times (2009, unknown): “CA 94720-3840”
- Decay estimates for variable coefficient wave equations in exterior domains (2008, methodology): “These estimates can be proved using a positive commutator argument with a multiplier which is roughly of the form f(r)∂r when n ≥ 3 and are quite akin to the bounds found in, e.g., [16], [24], [9], [20], [7], and [23].”
- Strichartz Estimates on Schwarzschild Black Hole Backgrounds (2008, background): “Then (4.55) follows after summation.”