Integration of nanoscale memristor synapses in neuromorphic computing architectures

By Giacomo Indiveri, B. Linares‐Barranco, Robert A. Legenstein, George Deligeorgis, T. Prodromakis. Nanotechnology, 2013

592 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Conventional neuro-computing architectures and artificial neural networks have often been developed with no or loose connections to neuroscience. As a consequence, they have largely ignored key features of biological neural processing systems, such as their extremely low-power consumption features or their ability to carry out robust and efficient computation using massively parallel arrays of limited precision, highly variable, and unreliable components. Recent developments in nano-technologies are making available extremely compact and low power, but also variable and unreliable solid-state devices that can potentially extend the offerings of availing CMOS technologies. In particular, memristors are regarded as a promising solution for modeling key features of biological synapses due to their nanoscale dimensions, their capacity to store multiple bits of information per element and the low energy required to write distinct states. In this paper, we first review the neuro- and neuromorphic computing approaches that can best exploit the properties of memristor and scale devices, and then propose a novel hybrid memristor-CMOS neuromorphic circuit which represents a radical departure from conventional neuro-computing approaches, as it uses memristors to directly emulate the biophysics and temporal dynamics of real synapses. We point out the differences between the use of memristors in conventional neuro-computing architectures and the hybrid memristor-CMOS circuit proposed, and argue how this circuit represents an ideal building block for implementing brain-inspired probabilistic computing paradigms that are robust to variability and fault tolerant by design.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe818b111417e2be0deed1d2e9dad5d0f44eb24f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. J. Joshua Yang
  2. Qiangfei Xia
  3. John Paul Strachan
  4. Zhongrui Wang
  5. Shih-Chii Liu
  6. Giacomo Indiveri
  7. C. D. Wright
  8. Harish Bhaskaran

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Giacomo Indiveri
  2. Shih-Chii Liu
  3. R. S. Williams
  4. Harish Bhaskaran
  5. Wolfram H. P. Pernice
  6. C. D. Wright
  7. Carlos Ríos
  8. Zengguang Cheng

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. J. Joshua Yang
  2. Giacomo Indiveri
  3. Qiangfei Xia
  4. John Paul Strachan
  5. Zhongrui Wang
  6. Shih-Chii Liu
  7. R. S. Williams
  8. Harish Bhaskaran

Citations in the corpus