Mating signal partitioning in multi‐species assemblages: a null model test using frogs

By A. A. Chek, J. Bogart, S. Lougheed. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe6e190ce1c415c85522594fbe8814f9b2ac9728

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Sandrine Pavoine
2. Jérôme Sueur
3. David A. Luther
4. Almo Farina
5. Nadia Pieretti
6. Amandine Gasc
7. Adelaide V. Lindseth
8. P. Lobel

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. David A. Luther
2. Jérôme Sueur
3. Sandrine Pavoine

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sandrine Pavoine
2. David A. Luther

Citations in the corpus

• Acoustic Indices for Biodiversity Assessment and Landscape Investigation (2014, unknown): “These species may compete or cooperate for a limited acoustic space [7, 16, 17, 18, 19].”
• Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal (2008, background): “This effect should be even more significant for stable communities than for perturbed communities where recent invader species might have changed the acoustic equilibrium of the community [ 32 ].”
• The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in a neotropical rain forest (2009, background): “One reasonmight be that acoustic space hasmultiple axes, including song features (Littlejohn 1959; Hodl 1977; Chek et al. 2003), the timing of signaling (Sueur 2002), and the spatial location of signalers (Drewry and Rand 1983; Duellman and Pyles 1983; Chek et al. 2003), which together create a…”