IceCube-Gen2: A Vision for the Future of Neutrino Astronomy in Antarctica

By I. C. M. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, G. Anton, C. Arguelles and 317 more. 2014

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

20 pages, 12 figures. Address correspondence to: E. Blaufuss, F. Halzen, C. Kopper (Changed to add one missing author, no other changes from initial version.)

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe62755ddc602acc107e3d1e185466e071d9555a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. M. Petropoulou
2. F. Oikonomou
3. Kohta Murase
4. Todor Stanev
5. C. Giunti
6. Julien Lesgourgues
7. W. Rhode
8. C. Buck

Citations in the corpus

• Extending the Search for Muon Neutrinos Coincident with Gamma-Ray Bursts in IceCube Data (2017, methodology): “Similar constraints were calculated for simple power-law spectra consistent with IceCube’s observed astrophysical neutrino flux (Aartsen et al. 2014c, 2015b, 2015c, 2016c), concluding that 0.4% of the astrophysical neutrino flux can be the result of a GRB prompt, quasi-diffuse flux assuming no…”
• Blazar Flares as an Origin of High-energy Cosmic Neutrinos? (2018, methodology): “Thus next generation neutrino detectors such as IceCube-Gen2 (Aartsen et al. 2014) and KM3Net (Adrian-Martinez et al. 2016) will be necessary to address these puzzles.”
• Status of light sterile neutrino searches (2019, methodology): “While more data will be collected with IceCube, stronger constraints in particular at higher values of ∆ms are expected mostly from the next generation of underwater- and underice neutrino telescopes KM3Net [193] and IceCube-Gen2 [201].”