Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research.
By Klaus R. Scherer, A. Schorr, Tom Johnstone. 2001
1,901 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe6215fa06cc12f2ce776483c8da2996df7efb2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- James C. Hayton
- G. Cacciotti
- Melissa S. Cardon
- S. D’Mello
- E. Diener
- Erik Cambria
- Kristen A. Lindquist
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. (2014, background): “Next, the individual appraises a stimulus’s emotional significance, and this triggers an affective, physiological and behavioral response (Scherer et al. 2001; Barrett et al. 2007).”
- The Internalization Theory of Emotions: A Cultural Historical Approach to the Development of Emotions (2013, background): “Hence, already in the 1970s Leont’ev had formulated a functional definition of emotion that essentially has a great deal in common with the definitions of emotion in the so-called appraisal theories currently shaping emotion research (see Frijda, 1986; Lazarus, 1991; Scherer et al., 2001).”
- Emotion representation, analysis and synthesis in continuous space: A survey (2011, unknown): “, [1], [3], [4], [5]).”
- Beginning teachers' situated emotions: A study of first classroom experiences (2003, background): “Inseparable from cognitions, emotions are veritable motors of action (Damasio, 1999; Scherer et al., 2001).”
- Assessing the Ability to Recognize Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion: Construction and Validation of the Emotion Recognition Index (2011, background): “In contrast, emotion perception competence refers to the ability to accurately perceive and interpret the emotional state of other individuals to correctly infer their reactions to salient events and to predict their action tendencies (Scherer 1984, 2001, 2007, 2009).”