A Comparison of Pivot Methods for Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation
By Masso Utiyama, Hitoshi Isahara. 2007
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Graham Neubig
- Philipp Koehn
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Felix Stahlberg
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Yonatan Belinkov
- Rico Sennrich
- Mohit Bansal
Citations in the corpus
- Edinburgh’s Phrase-based Machine Translation Systems for WMT-14 (2014, methodology): “Given the phrase-table for Urdu-English p(ūi|ēi) and the phrase-table for English-Hindi p(ēi|h̄i), we estimated a Urdu-Hindi phrase-table p(ūi|h̄i) using the well-known convolution model (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007):”
- Complete Multilingual Neural Machine Translation (2020, neutral): “An alternative approach is called bridging (Cohn and Lapata, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007).”
- Zero-Resource Translation with Multi-Lingual Neural Machine Translation (2016, methodology): “Zero-resource translation has been addressed by pivot-based translation in traditional machine translation research (Wu and Wang, 2007; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Habash and Hu, 2009), but we explore a way to use the multi-way, multilingual neural model to translate directly from a source to target ”
- Speak, Read and Prompt: High-Fidelity Text-to-Speech with Minimal Supervision (2023, methodology): “Using these representations, we cast the TTS problem as a “translation” from text transcripts to acoustic tokens with semantic token representations serving as a pivot “language” (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007).”
- A Teacher-Student Framework for Zero-Resource Neural Machine Translation (2017, methodology): “This idea is widely used in SMT (de Gispert and Mari˜no, 2006; Cohn and Lapata, 2007; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007; Bertoldi et al., 2008; Wu and Wang, 2009; Zahabi et al., 2013; Kholy et al., 2013).”
- Paraphrasing Revisited with Neural Machine Translation (2017, methodology): “Wieting et al. (2015) take the paraphrases contained in PPDB and embed them into a low-dimensional space using a recursive neural network similar to Socher et al.”
- A neural interlingua for multilingual machine translation (2018, methodology): “Various extensions of the pivot technique have been proposed over the years, see (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007), (Miura et al.”
- Improved Zero-shot Neural Machine Translation via Ignoring Spurious Correlations (2019, background): “…et al., 2018; Ses-torain et al., 2018), that zero-shot NMT is sensitive to training conditions, and the translation quality usually lags behind the pivot-based meth-ods which use a shared language as a bridge for translation (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Cheng et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017).”
- Pivot-based Transfer Learning for Neural Machine Translation between Non-English Languages (2019, methodology): “…is usually done with pivoting through English, i.e., translating French ( source ) input to English ( pivot ) first with a French → English model which is later translated to German ( target ) with a English → German model (De Gispert and Marino, 2006; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007).”
- Neural Machine Translation with Pivot Languages (2016, background): “For low-resource language pairs, a pivot language is introduced to “bridge” source and target language in statical machine translation [De Gispert and Marino, 2006; Cohn and Lapata, 2007; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007; Bertoldi et al., 2008; Zahabi et al., 2013; El Kholy et al., 2013]”
- Unsupervised Pivot Translation for Distant Languages (2019, background): “Pivot Translation Pivot translation has long been studied in statistical machine translation to improve the accuracy of low/zero-resource translation (Wu and Wang, 2007; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007).”
- Machine Translation by Triangulation: Making Effective Use of Multi-Parallel Corpora (2007, methodology): “A single translation is then selected by finding the candidate that yields the best overall score (Och and Ney, 2001; Utiyama and Isahara, 2007) or by co-training (Callison-Burch and Osborne, 2003).”
- Investigations on large-scale lightly-supervised training for statistical machine translation. (2008, background): “There is some research trying to tackle this problem by using an intermediate pivot language, e.g. [1].”
- Image Captioning with Very Scarce Supervised Data: Adversarial Semi-Supervised Learning Approach (2019, background): “[2018] introduce a third modal information, Chinese captions, for language pivoting [Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2007].”
- Improving machine translation via triangulation and transliteration (2014, unknown): “We could estimate these probabilities in the same way as the phrase-translation probabilities as done in Utiyama and Isahara (2007), but we use the more principled phrase method as described in Wu and Wang (2007).”
- Findings of the 2021 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT21) (2021, background): “• Pivot (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Wu and Wang, 2009): Collect parallel X/English and Y/English data (often much larger than X/Y data), train two translators (X-to-English + English-to-Y), and pipeline them to form an X-to-Y translator”
- Improving Arabic-Chinese Statistical Machine Translation using English as Pivot Language (2009, methodology): “Most related to our work on pivoting are the following: Utiyama and Isahara (2007) studied sentence and phrase pivoting strategies using three European languages (Spanish, French and German).”
- Unpaired Image Captioning by Language Pivoting (2018, background): “Recently, many works have been done in the area of pivot strategies of NMT [13, 50, 45, 4, 57, 16, 27].”
- A Parallel Corpus for Evaluating Machine Translation between Arabic and European Languages (2017, methodology): “Researchers have explored ways to exploit existing resources by pivoting or bridging on a third language (Utiyama and Isahara, 2007; Habash and Hu, 2009; El Kholy et al., 2013).”