An extension of a theorem of Wu-Yau
By Valentino Tosatti, Xiaokui Yang. 2015
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We show that a compact Kahler manifold with nonpositive holomorphic sectional curvature has nef canonical bundle. If the holomorphic sectional curvature is negative then it follows that the canonical bundle is ample, confirming a conjecture of Yau. The key ingredient is the recent solution of this conjecture in the projective case by Wu-Yau.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe61319a1db41d2190d8ba22d836193193048945
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Xiaokui Yang
- Fang Zheng
- Quanting Zhao
- Simone Diverio
- Stefano Trapani
- Damin Wu
- Shing-Tung Yau
- Valentino Tosatti
In Geometry and Topology
- Xiaokui Yang
- Fang Zheng
- Quanting Zhao
- Simone Diverio
- Stefano Trapani
- Damin Wu
- Shing-Tung Yau
- Valentino Tosatti
Citations in the corpus
- RC-positivity, rational connectedness and Yau's conjecture (2017, background): “In [41], Tosatti and the author proved that any compact Kähler manifold with nonpositive holomorphic sectional curvature must have nef canonical line bundle, and with that in hand, we were able to drop the projectivity assumption in the aforementioned Wu-Yau Theorem.”
- K\"ahler manifolds of semi-negative holomorphic sectional curvature (2014, background): “ifolds. Remark7.2. After this paper had been completed and gone to press at the Journal of Differential Geometry, Wu and Yau gave a proof of Conjecture 1.2 in [WY15]. Subsequently, Tosatti and Yang in [TY15] extended that proof to the K¨ahler case. However, since these new proofs, which are based on ”
- On real bisectional curvature for Hermitian manifolds (2016, background): “o one has Ric(ωε) ≥ −ωε + ε0 +ε D ωh. Now if we apply the Schwarz Lemma Corollary 4.4 to the identity map from(Mn,ωε) onto (Mn,h), with λ= 1, µ= ε0+ε D , and κ= 0, then we get trωεωh ≤ nD ε0 +ε as in [16]. So trωεω≤ nD 2 ε0+ . The rest of the argument is identical to that of [16], so Theorem 1.7 hol”