Fifty Years of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Research: What Next?

By D. Dolling. 2001

1,174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe37fa5532fa00b10e827e3bcdbdaec740e73810

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Bifurcations in shock-wave/laminar-boundary-layer interaction: global instability approach (2007, background): “For a more comprehensive discussion of shock-boundary layer interaction phenomena of such base flows, see Délery & Marvin (1986), Smits & Dussauge (1996) and Dolling (2001).”
A scaling analysis for turbulent shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (2013, background): “Shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (SWBLIs) have been widely studied in the past few decades: see for example the review papers of Délery & Marvin (1986), Viswanath (1988), Dolling (2001), Smits & Dussauge (2006), Clemens & Narayanaswamy (2009) and Délery & Dussauge (2009).”
Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions (2014, background): “SBLI is a topic that has seen extensive study over the past 50 years (Dolling 2001), and there already exist many excellent reviews of past work on this topic.”
Transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in hypersonic flow (2014, neutral): “Reviews of SWBLI including the modelling issues may be found in Delery (1985), Dolling (2001) and Babinsky & Harvey (2011).”
Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble (2009, background): “In some instances, the interaction can significantly alter the heat exchange and produce important unsteady pressure loads which can greatly shorten the structural lifetime [9].”
Low-frequency dynamics in a shock-induced separated flow (2016, background): “In addition to high-frequency unsteadiness, which is associated with turbulent fluctuations, STBLIs in the supersonic regime display a characteristic low-frequency unsteadiness (Dolling 2001; Smits & Dussauge 2006; Clemens & Narayanaswamy 2014).”
Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation (2010, background): “This is especially true for transonic interactions, which have received comparatively less attention with respect to their supersonic counterparts, such as impinging shocks and compression ramps (Dolling 2001).”
A simple model for low-frequency unsteadiness in shock-induced separation (2009, background): “A recent review of the main properties of these flows can be found in Dolling (2001).”
Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation (2006, background): “Sufficiently strong interactions cause severely turbulent and highly unsteady separation of the boundary layer (Andreopoulos, Agui & Briassulis 2000; Dolling 2001; Smits & Dussauge 1996).”
Flow physics and RANS modelling of oblique shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction (2013, background): “…to inaccuracies in steady RANS solutions; however, it has been suggested that more fundamental issues such as the use of a single length scale or the application of wall functions in eddy viscosity models may contribute to their inaccuracy in simulations of separated flows (Dolling 2001).”
Large-eddy simulation of shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction (2006, background): “Given a limited observation time interval a LSSM time scale cannot be deduced quantitatively.”
Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer (2006, background): “The main characteristics of this interaction have been obtained (see most classical references in Delery & Marvin (1986) and Smits & Dussauge (1996) and in more recent reviews Dolling (2001), Lee (2001) for example.”