Identifying the elasticity of driving: Evidence from a gasoline price shock in California

By Kenneth T. Gillingham. 2014

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe37bd6ad8ffbe63ed6a83e67cbb88902ed1245d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. T. Litman
2. Austin C. Smith
3. Kenneth T. Gillingham

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Litman
2. Austin C. Smith
3. Kenneth T. Gillingham
4. D. Rapson
5. Gernot Wagner
6. X. Labandeira
7. C. Cattaneo
8. A. Ramos

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. T. Litman
2. D. Rapson
3. Austin C. Smith
4. Kenneth T. Gillingham
5. Gernot Wagner
6. C. Cattaneo
7. X. Labandeira
8. A. Ramos

Citations in the corpus

• The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy (2016, background): “For example, Gillingham (2014) shows that the elasticity of demand for driving with respect to the price of gasoline exhibits noticeable heterogeneity across different counties in California.”
• Spring Forward at Your Own Risk: Daylight Saving Time and Fatal Vehicle Crashes (2016, background): “Unfortunately, daily VMT data does not exist at the national level.”
• Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities: How Prices and Other Factors Affect Travel Behavior (2012, methodology): “Both Gillingham (2010) and Guo, et al. (2011) found that vehicle travel is more price sensitive for residents of urban, transit-accessible areas than for comparable households in automobile dependent areas.”