Scene categorization via contextual visual words
By Jianzhao Qin, Nelson Hong Ching Yung. 2010
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Liangpei Zhang
- Yanfei Zhong
- Lijun Zhao
- Ping Tang
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Jeff Schneider
- L. Huo
- Danica J. Sutherland
Citations in the corpus
- A 2-D wavelet decomposition-based bag-of-visual-words model for land-use scene classification (2014, background): “…efficiently with various local interest point detectors (Lowe 2004; Mikolajczyk and Schmid 2004) or dense regions (Lazebnik, Schmid, and Ponce 2006; Qin and Yung 2010), and describes it with local descriptors (Mikolajczyk and Schmid 2005) among which affine invariant features (e.g. the…”
- SIFT and color feature fusion using localized maximum-margin learning for scene classification (2011, methodology): “After transforming the image into Lab color space, the ROI is divided into 4x4 blocks.”
- Large patch convolutional neural networks for the scene classification of high spatial resolution imagery (2016, background): “The complexity of HSR-RS scenes is increased due to the difference in illumination and the various scales of HSR-RS image scenes.(6,7) The HSR-RS scene commonly refers to a subpart of a whole remote-sensing image, which carries comparatively clear semantic information about the”
- Support Distribution Machines (2012, background): “Qin and Yung (2010a) proposed another way to encode the spatial dependencies of patches into the visual words and achieved 90 .”