Flow equivalence of graph algebras
By T. Bates, David Pask. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 2002
77 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper explores the effect of various graphical constructions upon the associated graph C*-algebras. The graphical constructions in question arise naturally in the study of flow equivalence for topological Markov chains. We prove that out-splittings give rise to isomorphic graph algebras, and in-splittings give rise to strongly Morita equivalent C*-algebras. We generalize the notion of a delay as defined in (D. Drinen, Preprint, Dartmouth College, 2001) to form in-delays and out-delays. We prove that these constructions give rise to Morita equivalent graph C*-algebras. We provide examples which suggest that our results are the most general possible in the setting of the C*-algebras of arbitrary directed graphs.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe1cfd6e928affad516821296ee7af7a273c2ca8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
- G. Abrams
- Enrique Pardo
- Nathan Brownlowe
- Christopher Smith
- Michael F. Whittaker
- Toke Meier Carlsen
- A. Louly
- M. Tomforde
In Mathematical Physics
- G. Abrams
- Toke Meier Carlsen
- Enrique Pardo
- Nathan Brownlowe
- Christopher Smith
- Michael F. Whittaker
- A. Louly
- M. Tomforde
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Enrique Pardo
- Nathan Brownlowe
- G. Abrams
- Christopher Smith
- Michael F. Whittaker
- Toke Meier Carlsen
- A. Louly
- M. Tomforde
Citations in the corpus
- Graph algebras and orbit equivalence (2014, background): “Before we state the corollary we recall the terminology of [3].”
- Flow invariants in the classification of Leavitt path algebras (2008, methodology): “Proof. The proof is analogous to the proof of [ 9, Theorem 5.3 ], using the arguments of the proof of Theorem 3.3.”