Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroscience: Critically Acclaimed.
By Saurabh Sonkusare, Michael Breakspear, C. Guo. 2019
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Speech and music recruit frequency-specific distributed and overlapping cortical networks (2024, unknown): “Abbreviations according to the Brainnetome Atlas (Fan et al., 2016).”
- The Easy and Versatile Neural Recording Platform (T-REX): Design and Development Study (2023, background): “…is met, any medical device or technology can be included, as T-REX does not impose any further restrictions on technologies or types of experiments, including, but not limited to, speech production, audio or speech perception, movement, decision-making, and simple or naturalistic tasks [40,41].”
- T-Rex: sTandalone Recorder of EXperiments; An easy and versatile neural recording platform (2022, background): “As mentioned before, we do not impose restrictions on which technologies to use or the specific type of experiments that can be performed, whether speech production, audio or speech perception, movement, or simple or more naturalistic tasks ([30], [31]).”
- Age-related neural dynamics of empathy in preschoolers: an EEG study with naturalistic viewing (2026, unknown): “…our understanding of empathy-related networks, it faces inherent limitations in naturalistic stimulus paradigms for child studies due to scanner confinement and motion constraints (Raschle et al. 2009), compromising ecological validity crucial for developmental research (Sonkusare et al. 2019).”