The frequency and severity of catastrophic die‐offs in vertebrates

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The relationship between population size and temporal variability in population size (2004, background): “However, Reed et al. (2003b) present evidence contrary to this hypothesis, suggesting that catastrophes are simply the extreme end of a continuous distribution of environmental disturbances with their frequency scaling to the generation length of the organism.”
Extinction risk in fragmented habitats (2004, background): “Ultimately, conservation efforts should aim at developing contiguous blocks of habitat capable of supporting at least 2000 adult animals (Thomas, 1990; Reed et al., 2003a; Reed & Hobbs, 2003).”
Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, methodology): “The severity of each catastrophic event (C) was drawn from the empirical severity distribution of Reed et al. (2003).”
S.O.S. Pinna nobilis: A Mass Mortality Event in Western Mediterranean Sea (2017, background): “Although the proportion of the animal population removed during an MME remains the most widespread approach for defining a MME (Young, 1994; Reed et al., 2003; Garrabou et al., 2009; Ameca et al., 2012), only 9.”