Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in

By Philip J. Vergragt, Nils Markusson, Henrik Karlsson. 2011

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdf9bb2b3643043ac4b1f7dbbd4a025859cfed7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sabine Fuss
2. J. Minx
3. W. Lamb
4. M. Callaghan
5. Jianguo Liu
6. Felix Creutzig
7. Gregory F. Nemet
8. Pete Smith

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Sabine Fuss
2. J. Minx
3. M. Callaghan
4. W. Lamb
5. Pete Smith
6. Mathias Fridahl
7. Mariliis Lehtveer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Gregory F. Nemet
2. Thomas W. Hertel
3. Karen C. Seto
4. Felix Creutzig
5. Jane Lubchenco
6. W. Lamb
7. C. Kremen

Citations in the corpus

• Systems integration for global sustainability (2015, background): “A condition termed “carbon lock-in” has been used to describe systems that have evolved over long time frames to become dependent on fossil fuels (24, 25).”
• Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “One of the more circumspect studies on the important role of niche markets raises the issue of whether fossil fuel niches, such as EOR, could lock in fossil fuels rather than phase them out (Vergragt et al 2011).”
• Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers (2018, background): “Also, since a carbon tax only incentivizes emission reductions down to zero, it has to be complemented by some way of incentivizing negative emissions [42,35].”