Varieties of Indefinites
By Donka F. Farkas. 2002
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Languages that have determiners often have a rich inventory of them. In English, indefinite determiners include a(n), some, a certain, this, one, another, cardinals, partitives , the zero determiner of bare plurals (in some analyses) , and, according to Hom 1 999 and Giannakidou 2001 , any. Despite the attention indefinites have received in the literature, characterizing what is common to all of them and what is specific to each is still an elusive task. This paper investigates the first three deter miners in this list, attempting to provide a semantic characterization that accounts for their distribution. (For pertinent discussion of issues that overlap to some extent with those taken up below, see Kamp and Bende-Farkas 2002, and for a discussion of the French versions of some and a certain , see Jayez and Tovena (this volume) .) The Ds that concern us here share two characteristics : (i) they are indefinite, and (ii) they are existential when not in the scope of any operator or quantifier. As seen in [ 1 ] , they may occur as pivots in existential there constructions, and therefore all three form weak DPs .
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdeb0eeed14e5d1cf6f51e3e23a264630c1b396d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- FREE CHOICE IN MODAL CONTEXTS (2003, background): “I expect that an explanation of why representation (21a) is ruled out for (24) should follow from a proper theory of the distribution of this marked indefinite expression (e.g. Farkas 2002, Szabolcsi 2002).”