SPECIES‐SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF BAT ACTIVITY IN AN URBAN LANDSCAPE

By S. Gehrt, J. Chelsvig. 2004

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdd9a3abf7a3d0fbad1841fa0e250fcc6eeea5d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Urbanisation and Its Effects on Bats—A Global Meta-Analysis (2016, background): “This is in accordance with the results of Gehrt and Chelsvig (2003, 2004) investigating the response of bats in and around the highly populated city of Chicago, USA.”
Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluent on bat foraging ecology in an urban stream system. (2007, background): “…to be a habitat generalist that is very tolerant and flexible in its roosting habitat choices (Brigham, 1991; Everette et al., 2001; Agosta, 2002; Gehrt, 2004; Sullivan et al., 2006) and is found frequently in building roosts despite roosting in tree cavities in undisturbed areas (Kalcounis…”
Presence and Absence of Bats Across Habitat Scales in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina (2006, background): “…efforts that have attempted to elucidate these processes, and their single and synergistic ecological agents operating across spatial and temporal scales, have shown strong linkages between activity of bats and a combination of microhabitat and landscape variables (Gehrt and Chelsvig 2003, 2004).”
Shifts in bat community structure related to evolved traits and features of human-altered landscapes (2008, background): “However, Gehrt and Chelsvig (2004) suggested that urban areas may actually serve as source of habitat for some species in areas of intensive agricultural production such as the midwestern United States.”
Relating bat species presence to simple habitat measures in a central Appalachian forest (2005, background): “…L. borealis, or L. cinereus, open habitats probably provide additional foraging opportunities that are at a premium in these forested landscapes relative to more agricultural or suburban-dominated landscapes (de Jong, 1995; Gehrt and Chelsvig, 2003; Gehrt and Chelsvig, 2004; Owen et al., 2004).”
The roles of landscape context, niche breadth, and range boundaries in predicting species responses to habitat alteration (2006, methodology): “Based on our prior experience and other work on these or similar species (Walsh & Harris, 1996; Gehrt & Chelsvig, 2004; Moore & Swihart, 2005; C.E. Rizkalla, unpublished data), we selected as landscape predictors the Shannon diversity of cover types (landcover diversity), as well as the percentage…”
Sampling period, size and duration influence measures of bat species richness from acoustic surveys (2012, background): “…some authors sample continuously from dusk until dawn (e.g. Kuenzi & Morrison 1998; Williams, O’Farrell & Riddle 2006; Dzal et al. 2009), while others sample for only parts of the night (e.g. Wickramasinghe et al. 2003; Gehrt & Chelsvig 2004; Ford et al. 2005; Flaquer, Torre & Arrizabalaga 2007).”
Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural–urban gradient (2008, background): “Unlike the other myotine bats, little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) is more likely to be detected in fragmented parks throughout the NCR because they are known to forage in various cover types, roost in buildings, and migrate >200 km, well within range of all NCR Parks (Griffin 1940; Ghert and Che”