Replication package for: "Monopoly without a Monopolist: An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Payment System"

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts (2018, background): “Easley et al. (2017) and Huberman et al. (2017) analyze Bitcoin transaction fees and discuss the inefficiencies and congestion in mining and transactions.”
Blockchain without Waste: Proof-of-Stake (2020, background): “PoW dates back to Dwork and Naor (1992), Jakobsson and Juels (1999) and Back (2002). Later, Nakamoto (2008) popularized the concept to a broader audience by employing it to allegedly achieve consensus within a permissionless blockchain. Nakamoto (2008) provides only heuristic arguments for the valid”
Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation (2020, unknown): “…et al. (2019) and Saleh (2020) analyze mining/minting games in Proof-of-Work- and Proof-of-Stake-based public blockchains; Easley et al. (2019), Huberman, Leshno, and Moallemi (2019), and Cong, He, and Li (2020) study the market structure and industrial organization of miners; Cong and He…”
Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity Is Financed through Cryptocurrencies? (2019, unknown): “Possible benefits to securities markets include reducing equities settlement times and costs (Malinova and Park 2016; Khapko and Zoican 2016), increasing ownership transparency leading to improved governance (Yermack 2017), and providing a payments system with the network externality benefits of a m”