Methods of assessing microbial activity and inhibition under anaerobic conditions: a literature review

By A. Rozzi, E. Remigi. 2004

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Pollution, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd9e2ca5482566bb89e6d0cf642f0e3aa055fe1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Sasha D. Hafner
2. I. Angelidaki
3. Konrad Koch
4. C. Holliger
5. H. Fruteau de Laclos

In Pollution

1. Sasha D. Hafner
2. I. Angelidaki
3. Alan Guwy
4. Konrad Koch
5. C. Holliger
6. H. Fruteau de Laclos

In Water Science and Technology

1. Sasha D. Hafner
2. Alan Guwy
3. Konrad Koch
4. C. Holliger
5. H. Fruteau de Laclos

Citations in the corpus

• Improving Inter-Laboratory Reproducibility in Measurement of Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) (2020, methodology): “…Automatic Methane Potential Test System II (AMPTS II, 15 laboratories) [13,51], other volumetric methods (14 laboratories) [11,52], manometric methods (10 laboratories) [11,52], the absolute gas chromatography (GC) method (2 laboratories) [8], and the gravimetric method (2 laboratories) [12,39].”
• Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. (2009, background): “Chynoweth (1993), Angelidaki & Sanders (2004) and Hansen et al.”