Relationship Uncertainty, Partner Interference, and Intimacy within Dating Relationships
By Denise Haunani Solomon, Leanne K. Knobloch. 2001
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd874469b95949391a575e24562918451890cd95
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Leanne K. Knobloch
- Jennifer A. Theiss
- Kellie St. Cyr Brisini
- Denise Haunani Solomon
- Valerie J. Young
- Melissa A. Curran
- C. Totenhagen
- Lynne M. Knobloch-Fedders
In Social Psychology
- Leanne K. Knobloch
- Jennifer A. Theiss
- Kellie St. Cyr Brisini
- Denise Haunani Solomon
- Valerie J. Young
- Melissa A. Curran
- C. Totenhagen
- Lynne M. Knobloch-Fedders
In Sociology and Political Science
- Leanne K. Knobloch
- Jennifer A. Theiss
- Denise Haunani Solomon
- Kellie St. Cyr Brisini
- Valerie J. Young
- Melissa A. Curran
- C. Totenhagen
- Masaki Matsunaga
Citations in the corpus
- The content of relational uncertainty within marriage (2008, methodology): “External consistency was evaluated by including an eight-item measure of interference from partners (Knobloch & Solomon, 2004; Solomon & Knobloch, 2001) in the CFA models.”
- Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners (2007, background): “…analytic results imply that the three sources of relational uncertainty are distinct (Knobloch, 2007); however, the sources have covaried similarly with markers of relational turbulence in previous work (cf. Knobloch et al., 2001; Solomon & Knobloch, 2001; but see Knobloch & Donovan-Kicken, 2006).”
- Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation (2017, background): “…from casual to serious involvement in dating relationships corresponds with increases in relational uncertainty and interference from a partner, which in turn polarize cognitive, emotional, and communicative reactions to a variety of relationship episodes (Solomon & Knobloch, 2001, 2004).”
- A daily diary study (2013, background): “…often such studies involved only one partner in the romantic relationship (e.g., Knobloch & Solomon, 1999, 2002a; Planalp et al., 1988; Solomon & Knobloch, 2001) or all couples specific to one stage of relationship development (dating: Arriaga, 2001; Knobloch & Solomon, 1999; married:…”
- A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations (2004, background): “Guided by work suggesting that interference from partners peaks at moderate levels of intimacy (Knobloch & Solomon, 2004; Solomon & Knobloch, 2001), we also incorporated a path from the squared intimacy term to a partner’s interference.”
- Experiences of U.S. military couples during the post-deployment transition (2012, background): “Relational turbulence and reintegration after deployment The relational turbulence model seeks to explain relationships in transition (Knobloch & Theiss, 2010; Solomon & Knobloch, 2001; Theiss, Knobloch, Checton, & MagsamenConrad, 2009).”