Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis

By M. Cole. 2007

423 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd70cac2899cc5abe78991c31a1af80a53e1fa0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries (2019, background): “of the arguments put forth by Cole (2007). For the N11 countries, it can be said that at the early”
The impact of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation (2012, positive): “In this paper we estimate both the direct and indirect effects of the share of government expenditure of GDP on pollution by employing a similar empirical strategy to that used by Welsch (2004) and Cole (2007) in investigating the effect of corruption on pollution.”
Environmental Kuznets Curves for Carbon Emissions: A Critical Survey (2009, neutral): “Other studies have included measures of income inequality (Torras and Boyce, 1998, Magnani, 2000, Bousquet and Favard, 2005) and measures of corruption (Lopez and Mitra, 2000, Fredriksson et al., 2004, Cole, 2007).”
Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from a World Sample (2019, background): “Here, the environmental performance of country i in period t (EPIi,t) depends on a country’s economic complexity (ECIi,t), which is the key regressor of our analysis, as well as the level of economic development in per capita terms, log(GDP )i,t (taking also into account the Environmental Kuznets Cu”
The limits of democracy in tackling climate change (2018, background): “First, the economics literature has established corruption as an important determinant of carbon dioxide emission levels (e.g. Welsch 2004, Cole 2007).”
Does the quality of institutions modify the economic growth-carbon dioxide emissions nexus? Evidence from a group of emerging and developing countries (2020, methodology): “Cole (2007) investigated the direct and indirect (by means of economic growth) effect of corruption on CO2 emissions using a sample of 94 countries from 1987 to 2000.”
Financial development and environmental performance: evidence from China* (2010, background): “…growth, technology, foreign direct investment, government expenditure, corruption, and informal regulations (Grossman and Krueger, 1995; Pargal and Wheeler, 1996; Lopez and Mitra, 2000; Eskeland and Harrison, 2003; He, 2006; Karen et al., 2006; Cole, 2007; Tsuzuki, 2008; Yuxiang and Chen, 2010a).”