A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research.
By P. Adank, R. Smits, R. van Hout. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004
464 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd6cf13fbfd3d9350143608e07124ae695aaea79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Formant frequencies of vowels in 13 accents of the British Isles (2010, methodology): “The so-called Lobanov (z-score) transform was applied to each formant separately and for each speaker independently in order to erase physiologically-induced acoustic variation (Lobanov 1971, Adank et al. 2004).”
- Variation and change in the trap and strut vowels of RP: a real time comparison of five acoustic data sets (2007, methodology): “The procedures which performed best in preserving phonemic information, reducing anatomical/physiological variation, and preserving regional or sociolinguistic information (Adank et al. 2004: 3105) were those which were classified as vowel-extrinsic and formant-intrinsic.”
- An Empirical Study on L2 Accents of Cross-lingual Text-to-Speech Systems via Vowel Space (2022, methodology): “We apply the renowned Lobanov normalization method [28] to normalize speaker information on the vowel space, as many other linguistics researchers have proven its effectiveness [29, 30].”