An Adaptation of Brislin’s Translation Model for Cross-cultural Research

By Patricia S. Jones, J. Lee, L. Phillips, X. Zhang, K. Jaceldo. Nursing Research, 2001

816 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd5a954552e115c3c9b0277fd0c337d13ff7f2f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. W. Rojjanasrirat
2. V. Sousa

In Sociology and Political Science

1. W. Rojjanasrirat
2. G. Mortimer
3. Constanza Bianchi
4. V. Sousa
5. Kevin Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. (2011, background): “The symmetrical translation is the only category that facilitates the comparison of responses from individuals of one culture to those of another [6,12,13] and the determination of the most relevant types of cross-cultural equivalence: the semantic, conceptual, content, technical and criterion [1,17”
• Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. (2007, methodology): “Suggested remedies include combining translation techniques and modifying Brislin’s translation models (Jones et al. 2001).”
• Drivers of local food consumption: A comparative study (2015, background): “Both academics evaluated the appropriateness of the questionnaire items and cultural relevance of the constructs to ensure functional equivalence (Jones et al., 2001).”