Highlights from the XMM-Newton Extended Survey of the Taurus Molecular Cloud (XEST)

By M. Güdel, K. Briggs, K. Arzner, M. Audard, J. Bouvier, Eric D. Feigelson, E. Franciosini, A. Glauser, N. Grosso, G. Micela and 23 more. 2006

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

(abridged:) The XMM-Newton Extended Survey of the Taurus Molecular Cloud (XEST) surveys the most populated ~5 square degrees of the Taurus star formation region, using the XMM-Newton X-ray observatory to study the thermal structure, variability, and long-term evolution of hot plasma, to investigate the magnetic dynamo, and to search for new potential members of the association. Many targets are also studied in the optical, and high-resolution X-ray grating spectroscopy has been obtained for selected bright sources. The X-ray spectra have been coherently analyzed with two different thermal models (2-component thermal model, and a continuous emission measure distribution model). We present overall correlations with fundamental stellar parameters that were derived from the previous literature. A few detections from Chandra observations have been added. The present overview paper introduces the project and provides the basic results from the X-ray analysis of all sources detected in the XEST survey.Comprehensive tables summarize the stellar properties of all targets surveyed. The survey goes deeper than previous X-ray surveys of Taurus by about an order of magnitude and for the first time systematically accesses very faint and strongly absorbed TMC objects. We find a detection rate of 85% and 98% for classical and weak-line T Tau stars (CTTS resp. WTTS), and identify about half of the surveyed protostars and brown dwarfs. Overall, 136 out of 169 surveyed stellar systems are detected. We describe an X-ray luminosity vs. mass correlation, discuss the distribution of X-ray-to-bolometric luminosity ratios, and show evidence for lower X-ray luminosities in CTTS compared to WTTS. Detailed analysis (e.g., variability, rotation-activity relations, influence of accretion on X-rays) will be discussed in a series of accompanying papers.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd51491f24b663bb1d8c0b6c3d9119a29f5dad1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. K. Luhman
  2. L. Hillenbrand
  3. J. Owen
  4. Eric Mamajek
  5. L. Hartmann
  6. N. Calvet
  7. A. Kraus
  8. P. R. Allen

In Geophysics

  1. Jeroen Tromp
  2. J. Owen
  3. Yanqin Wu
  4. M. Gudel
  5. J. Reeves
  6. Qinya Liu
  7. Dimitri Komatitsch
  8. Andreas Fichtner

Citations in the corpus