Measuring the spins of accreting black holes

By J. E. McClintock, Ramesh Narayan, S. Davis, Lijun Gou, A. Kulkarni, J. Orosz, R. Penna, Ronald A. Remillard, J. Steiner. 2011

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A typical galaxy is thought to contain tens of millions of stellar-mass black holes, the collapsed remnants of once massive stars, and a single nuclear supermassive black hole. Both classes of black holes accrete gas from their environments. The accreting gas forms a flattened orbiting structure known as an accretion disk. During the past several years, it has become possible to obtain measurements of the spins of the two classes of black holes by modeling the x-ray emission from their accretion disks. Two methods are employed, both of which depend upon identifying the inner radius of the accretion disk with the innermost stable circular orbit, whose radius depends only on the mass and spin of the black hole. In the Fe Kα method, which applies to both classes of black holes, one models the profile of the relativistically broadened iron line with a special focus on the gravitationally redshifted red wing of the line. In the continuum-fitting (CF) method, which has so far only been applied to stellar-mass black holes, one models the thermal x-ray continuum spectrum of the accretion disk. We discuss both methods, with a strong emphasis on the CF method and its application to stellar-mass black holes. Spin results for eight stellar-mass black holes are summarized. These data are used to argue that the high spins of at least some of these black holes are natal, and that the presence or absence of relativistic jets in accreting black holes is not entirely determined by the spin of the black hole.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd49424612e9099b01a1d041e11f9ee1a25ce6c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. J. E. McClintock
  3. J. Steiner
  4. Ronald A. Remillard
  5. Cosimo Bambi
  6. A. Sa̧dowski
  7. A. Tchekhovskoy
  8. F. Yuan

In Instrumentation

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. J. E. McClintock
  3. J. Steiner
  4. Ronald A. Remillard
  5. Lijun Gou
  6. Jonathan M. Miller
  7. T. Belloni
  8. J. Orosz

Citations in the corpus