Ontogenetic niche shifts and resource partitioning of lake trout morphotypes

By M. Zimmerman, S. N. Schmidt, Charles C. Krueger, M. Jake Vander Zanden, R. Eshenroder. 2009

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd46a3b6e87aec0921d8f3839cdf3c1164dc3f02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Krueger
2. A. Lacoursière-Roussel
3. A. Muir
4. L. Bernatchez
5. V. Leclerc
6. G. Côté
7. M. Zimmerman

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Muir
2. C. Krueger
3. M. Hansen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Krueger
2. A. Lacoursière-Roussel
3. A. Muir
4. L. Bernatchez
5. V. Leclerc
6. G. Côté
7. M. Zimmerman

Citations in the corpus

• If Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus is ‘the most diverse vertebrate’, what is the lake charr Salvelinus namaycush? (2016, background): “Lean and siscowet-like lake charr in Great Slave Lake partitioned trophic resources within benthic (small charr) and pelagic (large charr) habitats, consistent with ontogenetic diet shifts (Zimmerman et al. 2009).”
• Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management (2016, background): “For instance, Lake Trout exhibit different ecotypes in lakes mainly due to differences in environmental conditions and/or prey field and feeding strategies (Zimmerman et al. 2009; McDermid, Shuter & Lester 2010).”