Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-Printed ULTEM® 9085 Material

By R. Zaldivar, D. Witkin, Tait D. McLouth, D. Patel, K. Schmitt, J. Nokes. 2017

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing (2018, background): “Moreover, high impact polystyrene [8], Nylon [8], Ultem® [9], polycarbonate [8], poly(vinyl alcohol), polypropylene [10] and the mixtures of any two thermoplastics [11] or reinforced thermoplastic composites [12,13] are suitable for FFF. Nanocomposite feedstocks, such as graphene [14,15] or CNT [16]”
A Systematic Survey of FDM Process Parameter Optimization and Their Influence on Part Characteristics (2019, methodology): “The following is a list of 115 commonly used FDM machines: Fortus FDM 400 mc machine (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) 116 [10,21,22], Fortus 360 mc machine (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, USA) [23], FDM 200 mc machine 117 (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) [24], FDM 1650 machine (Stratasys, Eden Prairie”