Critical Thinking in Elementary School Children

By N. Florea, E. Hurjui. 2015

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Our study aimed to identify which are the most appropriate methods and procedures to develop critical thinking in young schoolchildren. In the organization of teaching, we identified two contexts of analysis: static context and a dynamic context (procedural). Static context we localized to the teaching-learning for critical thinking. Here we aimed to identify the methods of developing the critical thinking framework specific to each stage of the development of critical thinking. Dynamic or procedural context is identifiable by methods that can be activated with specific tasks at all stages of teaching and learning.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd17fb05cd5513059a960d0c6b33bfc15ae29904

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Maskhur Dwi Saputra
2. Salama Embark Saleh
3. Dewi Kusuma Wardani
4. Khresna Bayu Sangka
5. S. Joyoatmojo

Citations in the corpus

• CRITICAL THINKING AS A 21st CENTURY SKILL: CONCEPTIONS, IMPLEMENTATION AND CHALLENGES IN THE EFL CLASSROOM (2019, background): “Florea and Hurjui (2014) proposed some active-participative methods and techniques for working in small groups to develop critical thinking.”
• Developing Critical-Thinking Skills through the Collaboration of Jigsaw Model with Problem-Based Learning Model (2019, background): “Critical thinking can also be said to be an active learning process for agreeing or disagreeing with information, judging to determine the truth, and changing misinformation to create new ideas (Florea & Hurjui, 2015).”