Myth, Confusion, and Science in Causal Analysis

By Judea Pearl. 2009

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ricardo M. A. Silva
2. Iv'an D'iaz
3. Robin J. Evans
4. Nima S. Hejazi
5. Nathan Kallus
6. Jan Peters
7. Benigno Uria
8. Edward H. Kennedy

Citations in the corpus

• Causal Inference through a Witness Protection Program (2014, methodology): “Our modification provides a different interpretation of their search procedure, which we use to generate candidate instrumental variables (Manski, 2007).”
• Causal mediation analysis for stochastic interventions (2019, background): “…interventions was first considered by Stock (1989) and has been the subject of recent study (Robins et al., 2004; Didelez et al., 2006; Tian, 2008; Pearl, 2009; Taubman et al., 2009; Stitelman et al., 2010; Dı́az and van der Laan, 2013; Dudı́k et al., 2014; Haneuse and Rotnitzky, 2013; Young et…”
• Interpretation and identification of causal mediation. (2014, methodology): “Since every structural equation model can be translated into an equivalent counterfactual (or potential outcome) model (Pearl, 2009b, Def.”