Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Torque Control With a Deadbeat Solution for PMSM Drives

By Wei Xie, Xiaocan Wang, Fengxiang Wang, Wei Xu, Ralph M. Kennel, D. Gerling, R. Lorenz. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print), 2015

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcc4a6c69329f8ba5a123b7cf3b29ad9e0406beb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Predictive Torque Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Using Flux Vector (2018, methodology): “At the same time, in order to improve the control accuracy of conventional FCS-PTC on torque and flux, some improved algorithms [15], [16] applied deadbeat control to PTC strategies.”
Deadbeat Predictive Current Control of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors with Stator Current and Disturbance Observer (2017, background): “2592534 to achieve high steady-state precision and fast dynamic torque response, many current control methods have been studied, and the most common current control methods are hysteresis control [1], proportional–integral (PI) control [2], and predictive control [3]–[9].”
Guidelines for the Design of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Controllers (2020, background): “triangular sector of the αβ-plane wherein the unconstrained solution lies [38], [40], [68], [90], [92], [97]–[99].”
Interleaved Model Predictive Control for Three-Level Neutral-Point-Clamped Dual Three-Phase PMSM Drives With Low Switching Frequencies (2021, background): “set is limited to the sector comprised of the nearest vectors, and the control algorithm is simplified effectively in [19].”