Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data
By Klaus Krippendorff. 2004
391 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcafbc022ee1dabd477b5b53c9f1ec790d59efe1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Najoua Elommal
- Patricia Baudier
- Noah A. Smith
- Philip Resnik
- Iryna Gurevych
- Lubica Hikkerova
- Justin H. Gross
- Amber E. Boydstun
In Statistics and Probability
- Najoua Elommal
- Patricia Baudier
- Noah A. Smith
- Philip Resnik
- Iryna Gurevych
- Lubica Hikkerova
- Justin H. Gross
- Amber E. Boydstun
Citations in the corpus
- The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance (2020, methodology): “The transcripts of interviews were content-analyzed by the technique of coding, which divided relevant content of transcripts into categories of di ff erent themes (Krippendor ff , 2004).”
- Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays (2014, methodology): “In addition, we evaluate if a sentence contains an argument component of a particular category using percentage agreement and two chance-corrected measures: multi-π (Fleiss, 1971) and Krippendorff’s α (Krippendorff, 1980).”
- The Media Frames Corpus: Annotations of Frames Across Issues (2015, methodology): “The simplest aspect of the annotations to compare is the choice of primary frame, which we measure using Krippendorff’s α (Krippendorff, 2012).5 4A small secondary experiment, described in supplementary material, was used to test the reliability of this process.”
- Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays (2014, background): “72 (Krippendorff, 2004) for argument components and α = 0 .”