Quantum State Merging and Negative Information

By Michal Horodecki, Jonathan Oppenheim, Andreas J. Winter. 2005

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We consider a quantum state shared between many distant locations, and define a quantum information processing primitive, state merging, that optimally merges the state into one location. As announced in [Horodecki, Oppenheim, Winter, Nature 436, 673 (2005)], the optimal entanglement cost of this task is the conditional entropy if classical communication is free. Since this quantity can be negative, and the state merging rate measures partial quantum information, we find that quantum information can be negative. The classical communication rate also has a minimum rate: a certain quantum mutual information. State merging enabled one to solve a number of open problems: distributed quantum data compression, quantum coding with side information at the decoder and sender, multi-party entanglement of assistance, and the capacity of the quantum multiple access channel. It also provides an operational proof of strong subadditivity. Here, we give precise definitions and prove these results rigorously.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcaf547926d29e0220c6b4ab86cda1eb2155886f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
  2. Renato Renner
  3. Michal Horodecki
  4. Matthias Christandl
  5. Andreas J. Winter
  6. Mario Berta
  7. John Watrous
  8. Patrick M. Hayden

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
  2. Michal Horodecki
  3. Renato Renner
  4. Matthias Christandl
  5. Andreas J. Winter
  6. Mario Berta
  7. John Watrous
  8. Patrick M. Hayden

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Renato Renner
  2. Hung Viet Nguyen
  3. Sándor Imre
  4. Laszlo Gyongyosi
  5. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
  6. Patrick M. Hayden
  7. Normand J. Beaudry
  8. Andreas J. Winter

Citations in the corpus