Thermomechanical response of AL-6XN stainless steel over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The response of clamped sandwich plates with lattice cores subjected to shock loading (2006, background): “The measured stress versus strain histories presented in Stout and Follansbee (1986) and Nemat-Nasser et al. (2001) indicate that the R is reasonably independent of the choice of plastic strain εp at which R is calculated.”
Response of metallic pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels to high intensity impulsive loading in air (2011, methodology): “The AL6XN alloy used for the study has high ductility and significant strain and strain-rate hardening characteristics making it well suited for dynamic loading applications [39].”
The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading (2006, background): “In each case, the faces of the sandwich beam and the monolithic beam were made from super-austenitic stainless steel, AL6XN [9] as this material offers high ductility and crevice corrosion resistance, and thereby has potential for marine application.”
Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading (2006, methodology): “Dynamic measurements on stainless steels are well represented using the values _e0 ¼ 4916 s � 1 and m = 0.154 ( Nemat-Nasser et al., 2001;”
Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading (2008, background): “Many austenitic and super-austenitic stainless steels have a desirable combination of these properties [15].”