Almost nonparametric inference for repeated measures in mixture models
By Thomas P. Hettmansperger, H. Thomas. 2000
65 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc91e8b3def1bee424972336fd6aeb6ad676bdc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David R. Hunter
- Didier Chauveau
- Michael Levine
- Hiroyuki Kasahara
- Katsumi Shimotsu
- Derek S. Young
- S. Bonhomme
- John A. Rhodes
In Statistics and Probability
- David R. Hunter
- Didier Chauveau
- Katsumi Shimotsu
- Hiroyuki Kasahara
- Michael Levine
- S. Bonhomme
- Derek S. Young
- John A. Rhodes
Citations in the corpus
- Maximum smoothed likelihood for multivariate mixtures (2011, methodology): “The second part of the M-step (17) becomes • M-step, part 2: For each component j and block ℓ ∈ {1, . . . , B}, let f t+1jℓ (u) = ∑r k=1 ∑n i=1w t ijI{bk=ℓ}Kh (u− xik) ∑r k=1 ∑n i=1w t ijI{bk=ℓ} = 1 nhλt+1j Cℓ r ∑ k=1 n ∑ i=1 wtijI{bk=ℓ}K ( u− xik h ) , (19) where Cℓ = ∑r k=1 I{bk=ℓ} is the number…”
- Semi-Parametric Estimation for Conditional Independence Multivariate Finite Mixture Models (2015, methodology): “The Water-level dataset To illustrate the adaptive block- and component-wise bandwidth approach, we consider a benchmark dataset previously analyzed by Hettmansperger and Thomas [22] and Elmore et al.”
- Inference for mixtures of symmetric distributions (2007, background): “ component distributions are assumed to come from a known parametric family, relatively little work has been done in the case where minimal assumptions are made regarding G. Hettmansperger and Thomas [7] report promising results when the component distributions are multivariate, by reducing the mode”
- Nonparametric Identification of Multivariate Mixtures (2010, methodology): “As emphasized in Hettmansperger and Thomas (2000), there is often little theoretical guidance for selecting the number of components and/or the form of the component distributions despite their key role in the specification of mixtures.”
- mixtools: An R Package for Analyzing Mixture Models (2009, background): “One such set of conditions is as follows: Hettmansperger and Thomas (2000); Cruz-Medina, Hettmansperger, and Thomas (2004); and Elmore, Hettmansperger, and Thomas (2004) treat the case in which φ j ( x ) equals the product · · · Thus, conditional on knowing that X comes from the j th mixture…”
- Non‐parametric identification and estimation of the number of components in multivariate mixtures (2014, methodology): “Hettmansperger and Thomas (2000) applied various tests of the number of components to the data transformed to a binomial mixture: Lindsay’s (1995) gradient function method suggests M =4, the Hellinger and the Pearson penalized distances suggest M = 2 and the bootstrapped likelihood ratio test…”
- Non‐parametric estimation of finite mixtures from repeated measurements (2016, methodology): “Popular applications include modelling unobserved heterogeneity in structural behavioural models, learning about individual behaviour from grouped data and dealing with corrupted data.”
- Identifiability of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables (2008, methodology): “Nonparametric mixture models have received much attention recently [4, 25, 26].”