Winding Configurations and Optimal Stator and Rotor Pole Combination of Flux-Switching PM Brushless AC Machines

By J. Chen, Z. Q. Zhu. IEEE transactions on energy conversion, 2010

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Advanced Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines (2010, methodology): “In [ 6 ], a simple analytical method was developed to optimize the combination of stator and rotor pole numbers for the FSPM machines.”
A Novel E-Core Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machine (2011, methodology): “in both machines to analyze the winding connections and factors [16], [17].”
Comparison of All- and Alternate-Poles-Wound Flux-Switching PM Machines Having Different Stator and Rotor Pole Numbers (2009, background): “D FE predicted values due to the influence of end winding.”
Novel Partitioned Stator Switched Flux Permanent Magnet Machines (2015, methodology): “According to switched flux machine design, the electrical angle is (5), where Nr is the number of rotor poles [29] αe = Nr αm .”
Influence of Slot Opening on Optimal Stator and Rotor Pole Combination and Electromagnetic Performance of Switched-Flux PM Brushless AC Machines (2011, result): “The machine having N r = n 1 N s + k exhibits a larger back EMF than that of the machine having N r = n 1 N s − k, which is consistent with the conventional and multitooth SFPM machines [21], [22].”
Overview of Stator-Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines (2011, methodology): “In addition, the combinations of stator and rotor pole numbers, the winding connections, and the winding factors of the FSPM machines having all poles and alternate poles wound are analyzed in [50] and [51], as shown in Fig.”