On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues

By L. T. Bosch, Nelleke Oostdijk, L. Boves. 2005

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Francisco Torreira
2. Jens Edlund
3. Emmanuel Dupoux
4. Mattias Heldner
5. Abdel-rahman Mohamed
6. Stephen C. Levinson
7. Sotaro Kita
8. Marianne Gullberg

In Language and Linguistics

1. Francisco Torreira
2. Stephen C. Levinson
3. Jens Edlund
4. Emmanuel Dupoux
5. Mattias Heldner
6. Wei-Ning Hsu
7. Gabriel Skantze
8. Marianne Gullberg

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Francisco Torreira
2. Stephen C. Levinson

Citations in the corpus

• Generative Spoken Dialogue Language Modeling (2022, background): “It is interesting to note that all models, except DLM-1, manage to capture the empirical fact that intra-turn pauses tend to be longer than between-turn gaps (Brady, 1968; Ten Bosch et al., 2005; Heldner and Edlund, 2010).”
• Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language (2015, background): “These rules predict that intra-speaker silent gaps (generated by rule 3) will be longer than inter-speaker ones, a fact shown to be correct on large samples of conversation [ten Bosch et al., 2005 report gaps between continuations by the same speaker to be about 140 ms (c. 25”
• Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations (2010, background): “…'floor', studies involving larger scale distribution analyses of such durations have typically defined their terms operationally in terms of stretches of speech ending in a speaker change, rather than stretches of speech ending in a transition-relevance place (cf. ten Bosch et al., 2005).”