Forward and Backward Intergenerational Goods: Why Is Social Security Good for the Environment?

By Antonio Rangel. 2003

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc74271ab9a0dcfebdd915d60269b9d065f0e48b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jean-François Mercure
2. J. Gowdy
3. N. Edwards
4. A. Bassi
5. H. Pollitt
6. J. Viñuales

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jean-François Mercure
2. J. Gowdy
3. N. Edwards
4. A. Bassi
5. H. Pollitt
6. J. Viñuales
7. C. Spash
8. U. Pascual

In General Health Professions

1. Jean-François Mercure
2. J. Gowdy
3. N. Edwards
4. A. Bassi
5. H. Pollitt
6. J. Viñuales

Citations in the corpus

• The Future of Social Security (2008, unknown): “…median-voters coordinate on a sufficiently effective trigger strategy (as in Bohn, 1999; Cooley and Soares, 1999; Boldrin and Rustichini, 2000; or Rangel, 2003), or on the self-fulfilling expectation that higher savings, due to lower current social security contributions, trigger a benefit cut…”
• The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK (2014, unknown): “The Table reports in panel (a) the number of UK natives and of EEA and non-EEA immigrants over the age of 15 in every fiscal year.”
• Toward a new welfare economics for sustainability (2005, background): “Rangel (2003) argues that social security is good for the environment.”
• Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy (2015, methodology): “Such approaches are used successfully in global ecosystem models such as HYBRID (Friend and White, 2000) and LPJ-GUESS (Smith et al., 2001) as well as in intergenerational investment and savings modelling (Gokhale and Kotlikoff, 2002, Miles, 1999, Rangel, 2003).”