The structure of a leafminer–parasitoid community

By A. Rott, H. Godfray. 2000

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Network ecology: topological constraints on ecosystem dynamics (2004, methodology): “based on the topology of a bipartite interaction graph (111; 49; 146; 87).”
The Neglect of Parasitic Hymenoptera in Insect Conservation Strategies: The British Fauna as a Prime Example (2001, background): “In another ichneumonoid group, the somewhat less well-studied Cryptinae, the percentage change (almost entirely additions) largely resulting from an analysis of just one big institutional collection is about 33% in the groups reviewed so far (Schwarz & Shaw 1998; 1999; 2000).”
DETERMINANTS OF PARASITOID–HOST ASSOCIATIONS: INSIGHTS FROM A NATURAL TACHINID–LEPIDOPTERAN COMMUNITY (2003, background): “…wasps (Askew 1961, Stone et al. 2002), tortricid moths (Mills 1992), tephritid flies (Hoffmeister and Vidal 1994), leafminers (Memmott et al. 1994, Rott and Godfray 2000), and aphids (Müller et al. 1999), have also revealed ecological characteristics of hosts that are correlated with parasitism…”
Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links (2008, background): “Sometimes authors consider networks of hosts and parasites in a narrower context than a community food web (Martinez et al. 1999; Muller et al. 1999; Memmott et al. 2000; Rott & Godfray 2000; Vazquez et al. 2007; Mouillot et al. 2008).”