Accurate sex identification of ancient human remains using DNA shotgun sequencing

By P. Skoglund, J. Storå, A. Götherström, Mattias Jakobsson. 2013

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From the field to the laboratory: Controlling DNA contamination in human ancient DNA research in the high-throughput sequencing era (2017, unknown): “…et al. 2015; Haak et al. 2015; Fu et al. 2016; Lazaridis et al. 2016), ancient genomic studies also provide powerful insights into physical anthropology and archaeology, such as genetic relatedness of samples (Vohr et al. 2015) or genetic sex determination (Skoglund et al. 2013; Green et al. 2010).”
Sex estimation using sexually dimorphic amelogenin protein fragments in human enamel (2019, methodology): “Currently, sex estimation relies on two methods: analysis of sexually dimorphic osteological features and detection of DNA markers that are specific to the X- and Y-chromosome (Krishan et al., 2016; McFadden and Oxenham, 2016; Mittnik et al., 2016; Phenice, 1969; Skoglund et al., 2013; Spradley and ”
Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe (2015, methodology): “We used a double stranded library preparation that is an adaption of Meyer and Kircher (2010)(3) and Kircher, Sawyer and Meyer (2012)(8), resulting in barcoded libraries with truncated adapters following (Rohland et al.”