Locust Phase Polyphenism: An Update
By Stephen J. Simpson, M. Pener. 2009
421 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc5804324c370c6c5eb07430a0cbaac0a3ab7f83
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- Locusts and remote sensing: a review (2013, background): “longevity, morphology and molecular biology.(6) Out of 6,400 described grasshopper species of the family Acrididae in the world, only about a dozen exhibit pronounced behavioral and/or morphological differences between phases, and should be considered locusts.”
- From Molecules to Management: Mechanisms and Consequences of Locust Phase Polyphenism (2017, methodology): “…landscape, vegetation type and land use may influence the likelihood of locust outbreaks and plagues are also considered in some more detail than in Pener and Simpson (2009) (Cease and Latchininsky) with the Central American Locust, Schistocerca piceifrons being used as a specific case study…”
- Endocrine Control of Insect Polyphenism (2012, background): “As pointed out by Pener and Simpson (2009), the term aggregation pheromone may not entirely be correct, and due to its repellent effects on conspecific males they propose the term “rival male repelling pheromone.””
- Locusts and grasshoppers: behavior, ecology, and biogeography (2011, background): “Only recently, significant advances were made in our understanding of L&G behavior and ecology, particularly individual and group movement, nutritional requirements, and biochemical mechanisms underlying the transformation between solitarious and gregarious locust phases [13–15]; see also review in ”