YodaQA: A Modular Question Answering System Pipeline
By Petr Baudi. 2015
41 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Retrieval & Search, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Retrieval & Search
- William W. Cohen
- Danqi Chen
- Haitian Sun
- Bhuwan Dhingra
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- William Yang Wang
- Manzil Zaheer
- Wenhan Xiong
In Natural Language Processing
- Mohit Bansal
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- William W. Cohen
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Jianfeng Gao
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Percy Liang
- Kyunghyun Cho
Citations in the corpus
- Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehension (2017, background): “Systems that try to answer questions using natural language resources such as YodaQA (Baudiˇs, 2015) typically use pipelined methods to retrieve related text, build answer candidates, and pick a final output.”
- Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions (2017, background): “There are a number of highly developed full pipeline QA approaches using either the Web, as does QuASE (Sun et al., 2015), or Wikipedia as a resource, as do Microsoft’s AskMSR (Brill et al., 2002), IBM’s DeepQA (Ferrucci et al., 2010) and YodaQA (Baudi ˇ s, 2015; Baudi ˇ s and ˇSediv ` y, 2015) — th”
- Progressively Pretrained Dense Corpus Index for Open-Domain Question Answering (2020, background): “Studies in the early stage (Kwok et al., 2001; Brill et al., 2002; Ferrucci et al., 2010; Baudiˇs, 2015) mostly rely on highly sophisticated pipelines and heterogeneous resources.”
- Open Domain Question Answering Using Early Fusion of Knowledge Bases and Text (2018, methodology): “4232 A naı̈ve option, in such a setting, is to take stateof-the-art QA systems developed for each source, and aggregate their predictions using some heuristic (Ferrucci et al., 2010; Baudiš, 2015).”