Disentangling Transfer in Continual Reinforcement Learning

By Maciej Wolczyk, Michal Zajkac, Razvan Pascanu, Lukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Milo's. 2022

42 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The ability of continual learning systems to transfer knowledge from previously seen tasks in order to maximize performance on new tasks is a significant challenge for the field, limiting the applicability of continual learning solutions to realistic scenarios. Consequently, this study aims to broaden our understanding of transfer and its driving forces in the specific case of continual reinforcement learning. We adopt SAC as the underlying RL algorithm and Continual World as a suite of continuous control tasks. We systematically study how different components of SAC (the actor and the critic, exploration, and data) affect transfer efficacy, and we provide recommendations regarding various modeling options. The best set of choices, dubbed ClonEx-SAC, is evaluated on the recent Continual World benchmark. ClonEx-SAC achieves 87% final success rate compared to 80% of PackNet, the best method in the benchmark. Moreover, the transfer grows from 0.18 to 0.54 according to the metric provided by Continual World.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning, Meta & Continual Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Hang Su
  2. Jun Zhu
  3. Liyuan Wang
  4. Xingxing Zhang
  5. Tianyu Pang
  6. Yinpeng Dong
  7. Vamsi Krishna Ithapu
  8. Mirella Lapata

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Liyuan Wang
  2. Jun Zhu
  3. Hang Su
  4. Xingxing Zhang

In Meta & Continual Learning

  1. Xingxing Zhang
  2. Liyuan Wang
  3. Hang Su
  4. Jun Zhu
  5. Simone Scardapane
  6. Valerio Marsocci
  7. Liyuan Wang
  8. Hongwei Yan

Citations in the corpus