Waking the dead: the value of population genetic analyses of historical samples

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation (2010, background): “…commercial releases of salmonids have resulted in a ban for all types of fish releases where the released individuals originate from anything but the same population as the native, local stock (i.e., only socalled supportive breeding; Ryman and Laikre 1991) is allowed (Nielsen and Hansen 2008).”
The importance of considering genetic diversity in shark and ray conservation policies (2017, unknown): “2002; Nielsen and Hansen 2008; Bonamoni et al.”
Half a century of genetic interaction between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: Status of knowledge and unanswered questions (2017, unknown): “…for seven populations using microsatellite markers, an approach that had been previously (Nielsen, Hansen, & Loeschcke, 1997) and subsequently (Nielsen & Hansen, 2008) demonstrated as an effective way to investigate temporal genetic stability in populations in the face of anthropogenic…”
Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “Next-generation DNA sequencing tools, in combination with novel analyses and applied to temporal samples, hold promise to significantly advance this field and to enable a more global research effort (Nielsen and Hansen 2008; Hansen et al. 2012).”