The Critique of Psychology: From Kant to Postcolonial Theory

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Affordances for Social Psychology of the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing (2007, background): “In his recent historical review of critiques of psychology, Teo (2005) proposes a distinction between ‘successful’ and ‘influential’ critiques.”
Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020, unknown): “Scholars applying critical (e.g., Sloan, 2000; Teo, 2005) and liberation psychology (e.g., Fanon, 1967; Martín-Baró, 1996) perspectives critique positivism and post-positivism for framing psychologists as neutral observers of marginalized people.”
From Psychological Science to the Psychological Humanities: Building a General Theory of Subjectivity (2017, background): “The psychological humanities may be implicitly or explicitly critical of the epistemological foundations of the psychological sciences (see Teo, 2005), but the following argument is not about critique but about showing the relevance of the psychological humanities for psychological knowledge, using…”
From Speculation to Epistemological Violence in Psychology (2008, background): “Interpretative credibility may be based on theoretical and hermeneutic competencies in psychology; more specifically, skeptical or critical thinking should be used for assessing interpretative speculations (e.g., Slife, Reber, & Richardson, 2005; Teo, 2005).”