Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications

By Benjamin Sovacool, Michael H. Dworkin. 2015

1,205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Energy, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0e6772d541ffbed4a370f4ffb8e65e99dc0d64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Energy

In Pollution

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

The energy‐extractives nexus and the just transition (2021, background): “…people are always to be treated as ends, and never as means only’ (Kant 1786, cited in Rawls, 1973), then how we frame the just transition concept matters a great deal, as we need to understand who bears the burden and shares the benefits of a global energy transition (Sovacool & Dworkin, 2015).”
The methodologies, geographies, and technologies of energy justice: a systematic and comprehensive review (2021, background): “The use of PVE might contribute to citizens’ acceptance of government decisions by recognizing three justice dimensions that play an important role in acceptance of government policies: distributive, procedural justice and justice as recognition (Jenkins et al. 2016; McCauley et al. 2013; Sovacool e”
New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice (2017, background): “…climate justice has predominantly concerned itself with issues of justice among and between existing and future humans (Palmer, 2011), work such as that of (Schneider & Lane, 2006) on “inter-species equity” has influenced the thinking of energy justice scholarship (e.g. Sovacool & Dworkin, 2015).”
Feasibility of energy justice: Exploring national and local efforts for energy development in Nepal (2017, methodology): “Below we list six principles adapted from their approach (see Sovacool and Dworkin, 2015:438).”
Spatializing energy justice (2017, background): “At a broad level, consideration of the justice dimensions of energy policy decisions is a vital decision-making tool that can assist policy-makers, planners and regulators in making fully informed and comprehensive choices (Sovacool and Dworkin, 2015).”
Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition” (2017, neutral): “The burgeoning energy justice scholarship highlights justice and equity concerns in the context of global decarbonization, climate change and the transition to a green economy (Sovacool, 2014; Sovacool and Dworkin, 2015; Jenkins, McCauley et al., 2016; Jenkins et al., 2017; Sovacool et al., 2017).”
Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: a business model perspective (2017, background): “The paper also aims to show how a “new story” (Magretta, 2002) about energy just business models can be developed, a theme that has so far remained peripheral in the energy justice literature summarized by Sovacool and Dworkin (2014, 2015).”
Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: Exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research (2019, background): “The energy justice framework is designed to provide normative and empirical assessments on both old and new contexts [11].”
The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition (2020, neutral): “Second, procedural justice focuses on who is included in energy decision-making processes and seeks to ensure that energy procedures are fair, equitable and inclusive of all who choose to participate 14 .”
Electricity access and income inequality in South Africa: Evidence from Bayesian and NARDL analyses (2020, background): “This helps to capture the three concepts (distribution, procedural, and recognition) espoused as key components of the energy justice framework [25,26].”