Effect of superrefraction on inversions of radio occultation signals in the lower troposphere
By Sergey Sokolovskiy. 2003
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbfc4eb0c85d0d72f99b8323f74a3b750e034301
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Kursinski
- Byron A. Iijima
- D. Kuang
- L. Romans
- Y. Kuo
- Manuel de la Torre Juarez
- T. Yunck
- D. Rossiter
Citations in the corpus
- CHAMP and SAC-C atmospheric occultation results and intercomparisons (2004, methodology): “Both of these solutions, which are currently being implemented for the COSMIC program and tested on the CHAMP and SAC-C flight receivers, will reduce the N-bias to less than 1%. This remaining bias is caused by atmospheric ducting [ Sokolovskiy, 2001a, 2003; Ao et al., 2003]; methods for reducing i”
- Inversion and error estimation of GPS radio occultation Data (2004, methodology): “The existence of the negative N bias was first noticed and discussed by Rocken et al. (1997) for GPS/MET, and recently confirmed by modeling receiver tracking loops (Ao et al. 2003; Beyerle et al. 2003) and superrefraction in PBL (Sokolovskiy 2003).”
- Exploring earth's atmosphere with radio occultation: contributions to weather, climate and space weather (2011, unknown): “The mean difference is shown by the red line and the standard deviation of the differences by the solid blue lines (Ho et al., 2010a). vich, 1998a,b; Gorbunov and Kornblueh, 2001; Ao et al., 2003; Sokolovskiy, 2001, 2003; Beyerle et al., 2004, 2006 and Wickert et al., 2004.”
- Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT‐3 mission (2007, background): “the size of the aperture, results in errors of the retrieved profile above the cut-off altitude [Sokolovskiy, 2003].”
- COSMIC‐2 Radio Occultation Constellation: First Results (2020, background): “…of different factors: SR (affects refractivity; Ao et al., 2003; Ao, 2007; Sokolovskiy, 2003; Xie et al., 2006; Xie et al., 2010), tracking depth and noise (Sokolovskiy, 2003; Sokolovskiy et al., 2010), and fluctuations of refractivity (Gorbunov et al., 2015; Gorbunov & Kirchengast, 2018).”
- Comparison of GPS radio occultation soundings with radiosondes (2005, background): “This is attributed to the well-known negative refractivity bias associated RO soundings in the tropical lower troposphere [Rocken et al., 1997; Sokolovskiy, 2003; Ao et al., 2003], as a similar bias can be found in the RO and ECMWF comparison.”