Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship.

By Georgina M. Mace, K. Norris, A. Fitter. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2012

1,757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbfbac82e78a59baf4df3e34401027c4e8b3b6f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Biodiversity in a changing climate: a synthesis of current and projected trends in the US (2013, background): “As a result, our ability to predict responses to the synergistic impacts of climate change and other stressors, as well as consequences to the societal benefits that biodiversity supports, remains limited (Cardinale et al. 2012; Mace et al. 2012).”
A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services (2014, background): “…and functions (Kremen, 2005; Bennett et al., 2009; de Groot et al., 2010) and mostly positively related to biodiversity (Balvan-era et al., 2006; Mace et al., 2012; Harrison et al., 2014). de Groot et al. (2002) defined “habitat and gene pool protection services” (R6) as a basis for other…”
Strengthening conceptual foundations: Analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research (2013, neutral): “This distinction, and the use of a terminology of ‘goods’ and ‘final ecosystem services’, is reflected in the NEA framework (NEA, 2011) and associated work (e.g. Mace et al., 2012).”
The value of green walls to urban biodiversity (2017, background): “Biodiversity has multiple roles in the delivery of ecosystem services: as a supporting service of other ecosystem services, as a final regulating ecosystem service in itself, and as a good such as the existence of an iconic species (Atkinson et al., 2012; Mace et al., 2012).”
Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, background): “(Cox and King, 2013, p. 588) value of biodiversity in increasing ecosystem stability and resilience (Balvanera et al., 2006; Jax, 2010; Mace et al., 2012).”
Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. (2015, background): “…agricultural intensification, intercropping systems must be optimized to enhance resource-use efficiency and crop yield simultaneously (Li et al., 2013, 2014), while also promoting wider benefits, including the delivery of multiple ecosystem services and ‘goods’ (sensu Mace et al., 2012).”