PARTY IDENTIFICATION: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?

By Richard Johnston. 2006

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbf1c3922d8508493ad1b7ed467bdc16aed5825f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Nicholas O. Rule
2. John T. Jost
3. Chadly Stern
4. Stephen Vaisey
5. Joanna Sterling
6. Andrei Boutyline
7. Aaron C. Kay

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Nicholas O. Rule
2. John T. Jost
3. Chadly Stern
4. Stephen Vaisey
5. Joanna Sterling
6. Andrei Boutyline

In Strategy and Management

1. Nicholas O. Rule
2. John T. Jost
3. Chadly Stern
4. Stephen Vaisey
5. Joanna Sterling
6. Andrei Boutyline

Citations in the corpus

• Belief Network Analysis: A Relational Approach to Understanding the Structure of Attitudes (2017, background): “…cues play an outsize role in how individuals reason about political information, and that identity changes lead to changes in political values but not vice versa (e.g., Zaller 1992; Mondak 1993; Bartels 2002; Cohen 2003; Mondak et al. 2004; Goren 2005; Goren et al. 2009; but see Johnston 2006).”
• The Politics of Fear: Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in Existential Motivation? (2017, methodology): “In an effort to integrate 50 years of theory and research on the social, cognitive, and motivational underpinnings of adherence to left–right (or liberal–conservative) ideology, Jost et al. (2003) reviewed studies carried out between 1958 and 2002 that linked variability in political attitudes to si”