Heaven or Hubris: Reflections on the New 'New Poverty Agenda'

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From philanthropy to a different way of doing business: strategies and challenges in integrating pro-poor approaches into tourism business (2006, background): “…of Southern Africa DOI: 10.1080=03768350600707553 approaches to poverty reduction (in education, health and targeted income support) are not up to the challenge (see Rogerson, 2002; Maxwell, 2003), while macro-economic growth does not always deliver benefits to the majority (Cord et al., 2003).”
The Trouble with the MDGS: Confronting Expectations of Aid and Development Success (2007, background): “16) point out that the goals suffer from diminished effectiveness because accountability for failing to meet them is diffuse, and Maxwell (2003) argues that they may reward oversimplified interventions overemphasizing social indicators at the expense of economic growth.”
RETHINKING RURAL DEVELOPMENT (2001, background): “…a widespread breakdown institutions easily be identified in other parts of the world (Colombia, Afghanistan, And not just rural development: see Maxwell (2001b) on similar issues in multi-sectoral multi-sectoral nutrition necessarily completely off the agenda in CPI situations, but clearly…”