The monopolistic competition revolution in retrospect

By S. Brakman, B. Heijdra. 2001

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Frontiers of the New Economic Geography (2005, unknown): “al[29] applied Hanson’s[72] model to the case of Germany, and also found positive results.”
Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data (2011, unknown): “The freeness measure captures the inverse of trade costs so that a high value corresponds to low trade barriers (see Baldwin et al. 2003; Fujita, Krugman, and Venables 1999; Head and Mayer 2004).”
New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences☆ (2009, background): “That said, given the success of the Dixit–Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition in various economic fields (Matsuyama, 1995; Brakman and Heijdra, 2004), the economics profession should strive to develop more general models of monopolistic competition.”
Cities and product variety: evidence from restaurants (2015, background): “Note that there are also asymmetric versions of these models; the authors discuss an asymmetric case of their model in chapter 4 of the compilation ‘The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect’ (Brakman and Heijdra, 2004).”